Seniors in Suburbia
Nov 01, 2001
Publisher: American Demographics

American Demographics

For decades, any mention of demographic "hot spots" for seniors conjured images of swelling retirement meccas in Florida and Arizona, along with sun, golf and relaxation. All of this has changed, of course. The new list of senior growth magnets, based on an analysis of Census 2000, cuts a broad swath across much of the West, and a good part of the South, stretching well beyond the Sunshine state. Some of these new areas have different kinds of amenities, including "wired" communities and university towns where the term "surfing" relates to the World Wide Web. The fastest growing metros for seniors now lie in the small to medium-size range. And the greatest rise in elderly growth is taking place in the suburbs.

The Lull Before the Storm

Nationally, the 1990s can be considered a slow decade for the growth of the elderly population (ages 65 and above). Because the small Depression cohort entered the elderly ranks during this decade, the senior population grew by just 12 percent, compared with 22 percent in the 1980s. Yet the 1990s represent only a temporary slowdown in elderly growth, which will explode over the next 30 years, as the Baby Boom becomes absorbed into the ranks of the elderly.

Hot States for Seniors

Despite the low national senior growth rate, some states have seen large increases. (See Map 1, page 19.) Nevada's elderly population grew by more than 70 percent during the 1990s, while senior growth in other Western states - Alaska, Arizona, New Mexico, Hawaii, Utah and Colorado - all exceeded 25 percent. In the South, Florida is hardly the only place where the elderly flock, as South Carolina, Texas, North Carolina and Georgia all registered faster senior growth rates during the '90s (19 percent or higher) than did Florida (18.5 percent).

Most of these states are attractive to people of retirement age because of their wide array of amenities, such as warmer climates and lower living costs. Moreover, many states in the South have made concerted efforts to lure seniors who, at least in their immediate post-retirement years, tend to contribute much more to the local economies and tax bases than they cost. Many well-off "yuppie elderly" between the ages of 65 and 74 have considerable disposable income, good health and remain in married-couple households.

Hotter Metros

Within these Southern and Western states, selected metropolitan areas experienced exceptionally high rates of senior growth during the '90s (Table 1). Las Vegas leads the pack with a growth rate of 86 percent. Yet, a group of senior metro "hot spots" have much smaller populations. This list includes Naples, Fla., Myrtle Beach, S.C., Las Cruces, N.M., and Flagstaff, Ariz., among other smaller metro areas with top quality amenities that have attracted seniors in droves. Other larger metro areas that have shown sharp rises in the over-65 set include "New South" urban centers like Houston, Dallas and Atlanta, along with counterparts in the "New West" like Phoenix and Denver.

Metro areas with a university environment like Austin, Texas, and Raleigh-Durham, N.C., were also attractive to seniors. In fact, the few Northern metro areas with higher than average senior growth rates include university towns: State College, Pa., Iowa City, Iowa, Bloomington, Ind., and Madison, Wis. The cultural amenities available in these places are especially attractive to today's elderly, who have more leisure time, and are better educated than those in previous generations. These areas are likely to increase in popularity as the Boomers ascend to seniorhood.

Big Shares, Small Gains

There is a paradox when it comes to the geographic distribution of seniors. States with the highest senior shares of their total population are not necessarily the ones that are growing the fastest. A number of states in the Great Plains, part of the Rust Belt and New England have higher than average concentrations of elderly citizens. Yet, most of these territories rank in the lowest echelon of senior growth. Pennsylvania, for example, holds the second highest share of seniors of all states i? 1/2 15.6 percent of its total population (compared with 12.4 percent nationally) i? 1/2 yet the Keystone state ranks at No. 45 in senior growth for the 1990s, as its elderly population grew by a mere 4.5 percent.

The reason for this paradox is that states with high senior shares of population typically experienced one decade or more of sustained population losses among their younger population. This leaves seniors, who are far less mobile than people in their 20s and 30s, remaining. In fact, many of the states with large shares of seniors tend to have more seniors in the "needy elderly" age group of 75 and above. For these Northern, economically stagnant states, even the younger, "yuppie elderly" were more likely to leave. So the social and demographic profiles of elderly populations in states with high shares of seniors may not be favorable to marketers of consumer items tailored to the younger segment of the elderly population. Moreover, the public expenditures required for maintaining the health and providing social support for older senior segments in many Frostbelt states will be higher than in states with more youthful elderly.

One exception to this paradox is Florida, which registered the highest senior share of any state i? 1/2 17.6 percent. This is a result of decades of attracting the elderly from other parts of the country, so that the Sunshine state continues to grow in both its "yuppie elderly" and "needy elderly" segments. Florida's dominance is also apparent from the list of metropolitan areas with highest senior shares (Table 2).

Large and small metropolitan areas with the greatest senior shares are located in Florida, with West Palm Beach and Punta Gorda leading their respective packs. Still, the list also contains large and small Frostbelt metros with relatively stagnant elderly population gains like Rochester, N.Y., St. Louis, Mo., Johnstown, Pa., and Barnstable-Yarmouth, Mass. So merely knowing that an area has a large elderly population only tells part of the story.

Just as elderly growth was mushrooming in small metropolitan areas, the '90s have also ushered in a new era of elderly growth within the suburbs. Seniors who celebrated their 65th birthday during the 1990s were those who began setting up households in 1950s suburbia. It's no wonder then that many of them have simply "aged in place," as they entered their retirement years. As 1990s senior growth in the suburbs reached 20 percent, in contrast to only 2.4 percent in central cities, some of the fastest growth occurred in peripheral, exurban communities within expanding metro areas like Atlanta, Dallas, and Washington, D.C. This "aging in place" growth of the now elderly postwar suburbanites is just the tip of the iceberg. These are the parents of the Baby Boomers who were born in the suburbs, lived most of their lives there, and will undoubtedly retire in the suburbia they helped to shape. This mushrooming senior growth in that part of America which was once associated primarily with child-raising will pose interesting dilemmas as the suburban "youth to age" transition occurs. Public debates over school systems versus golf courses, and emerging new safety concerns resulting from "senior gridlock" on the freeways, are among the issues likely to arise.

Beyond the Lull

While the '90s was a relatively slow growth decade for seniors, new trend lines for fast-growing regions and communities were set in motion. Broad segments of the Sun Belt, suburbia and smaller places are now on the cutting edge of growth profiles for upcoming elderly waves. In fact, several of the same metros with greatest senior growth and shares in the '90s are becoming staging areas for today's "pre-elderly" population of those ages 55 to 64 (Table 3). As many seniors simply "age in place," we can look ahead to a continuation of these trends which, of course, will be accelerated dramatically after the year 2011, when the first Baby Boomer blows out 65 candles on a birthday cake.

William H. Frey is a demographer and Senior Fellow at the Milken Institute in Santa Monica, Calif., and on the faculty of the Population Studies Center, University of Michigan. He can be reached at www.frey-demographer.org.


The over-65 population grew by 86 percent in the Las Vegas metropolitan area. Small metros, such as Naples, Fla., and Anchorage, Alaska, also experienced tremendous growth.


1. Las Vegas, NV-AZ MSA 86.2%
2. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ MSA 38.0%
3. Austin-San Marcos, TX MSA 37.3%
4. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX CMSA 31.8%
5. Atlanta, GA MSA 30.8%
6. Orlando, FL MSA 28.8%
7. Sacramento-Yolo, CA CMSA 27.8%
8. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC MSA 25.8%
9. Denver-Boulder-Greeley, CO CMSA 25.8%
10. Dallas-Fort Worth, TX CMSA 25.1%


1. Naples, FL MSA 77.9%
2. Anchorage, AK MSA 72.5%
3. Myrtle Beach, SC MSA 61.7%
4. Las Cruces, NM MSA 55.7%
5. Fort Walton Beach, FL MSA 55.1%
6. Ocala, FL MSA 47.0%
7. Flagstaff, AZ-UT MSA 46.3%
8. Wilmington, NC MSA 45.7%
9. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX MSA 43.8%
10. Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL MSA 42.6%

*Metro areas are CMSAs, MSAs and (in New England) NECMAs, as defined by OMB in June, 2000. Major metros have 2000 total populations exceeding 1 million; small metros have 2000 total populations of less than 1 million.

**1990-2000 change in the 65+ population as percent of the age 65+ population in 1990.

Source: William H. Frey analysis of 2000 U.S. Census


Small metros in Florida still have the greatest share of elderly. Nearly 35 percent of the total population in Punta Gorda, Fla. is made up of seniors age 65 and over. Among large metros, the West Palm Beach-Boca Raton area reigns.


1.West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL MSA 23.2%
2.Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL MSA 19.2%
3.Pittsburgh, PA 17.7%
4.Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY MSA 15.8%
5.Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL CMSA 14.5%
6.Cleveland-Akron, OH CMSA 14.3%
7.Hartford, CT NECMA 14.0%
8.Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-DE-MD CMSA 13.5%
9.Rochester, NY MSA 12.9%
10.St. Louis, MO-IL MSA 12.9%


1.Punta Gorda, FL MSA 34.7%
2.Sarasota-Bradenton, FL MSA 28.5%
3.Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL MSA 25.4%
4.Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL MSA 24.9%
5.Ocala, FL 24.5%
6.Naples, FL MSA 24.5%
7.Barnstable-Yarmouth, MA NECMA 23.1%
8.Daytona Beach, FL MSA 22.7%
9.Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL MSA 19.9%
10.Johnstown, PA MSA 19.1%

*Metro areas are CMSAs, MSAs, and (in New England) NECMAs, as defined by OMB in June, 2000. Major metros have 2000 total populations exceeding 1 million; small metros have 2000 total populations of less than 1 million.

**65+ population as percent of the total population in 2000.

Source: William H. Frey analysis of 2000 U.S. Census


Metropolitan areas such as Anchorage, Phoenix and Wilmington experienced a 50 percent increase in their pre-elderly population (age 55 to 64) between 1990 and 2000, while Las Vegas saw its retiree community rise by 89 percent.


1. Las Vegas, NV-AZ MSA 88.7%
2. Naples, FL MSA 74.0%
3. Yuma, AZ MSA 59.9%
4. Fort Collins-Loveland, CO MSA 56.9%
5. Santa Fe, NM MSA 54.1%
6. Austin-San Marcos, TX MSA 54.0%
7. Wilmington, NC MSA 51.9%
8. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ MSA 50.3%
9. Boise City, ID MSA 50.3%
10. Anchorage, AK MSA 50.1%
11. Flagstaff, AZ-UT MSA 49.9%
12. Myrtle Beach, SC MSA 49.5%
13. Atlanta, GA MSA 48.2%
14. Reno, NV MSA 43.0%
15. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC MSA 41.3%

The Barnstable-Yarmouth metropolitan area in Massachusetts has one of the highest shares of the pre-elderly population in the country - after Florida.


1. Punta Gorda, FL MSA 14.5%
2. Naples, FL MSA 12.7%
3. Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL MSA 12.4%
4. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL MSA 12.0%
5. Ocala, FL MSA 11.8%
6. Barnstable-Yarmouth, MA NECMA 11.5%
7. Daytona Beach, FL MSA 11.3%
8. Myrtle Beach, SC MSA 11.3%
9. Johnson City-Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA MSA 11.2%
10. Wilmington, SC, MSA 11.2%
11. Fort Pierce-Port St. Lucie, FL MSA 11.2%
12. Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL MSA 11.0%
13. Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH MSA 10.7%
14. Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV MSA 10.7%
15. Danville, VA MSA 10.6%

*Metro areas are CMSAs, MSAs, and (in New England) NECMAs, as defined by OMB in June, 2000.

**1990-2000 change in the 55-64 population as percent of the 55-64 population in 1990.

***55-64 population as percent of the total population in 2000.

Source: William H. Frey analysis of 2000 U.S. Census Copyright 2001 by Intertec Publishing Corporation, a PRIMEDIA Company. All rights reserved.

William H. Frey is a Senior Fellow at the Milken Institute and Research Scientist on the faculty of the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan.