Support MI up for updates Subscribe up for updates
About Research Events Centers Newsroom Currency of Ideas
Milken Institute | Research | Publications | Research Reports: A Pragmatic Plan for Housing Finance Reform
 A Pragmatic Plan for Housing Finance Reform
A Pragmatic Plan for Housing Finance Reform
Ellen Seidman, Senior Fellow at the Urban Institute; Phillip Swagel, senior fellow at Milken Institute; Sarah Rosen Wartell, President of the Urban Institute; and Mark Zandi, Chief Economist of Moody’s Analytics
June 19, 2013
Housing & Real Estate | Public Policy
Publisher: Milken Institute

In "A Pragmatic Plan for Housing Finance Reform," the authors articulate a vision and core principles without prescribing detailed legislative imperatives. They argue that continued flexibility consistent with basic principles will be essential as a new housing finance system develops in an environment of significant demographic and economic volatility.

When considering how a future housing finance system should operate, the authors emphasize the importance of diverse sources of mortgage funding; participation in the system by lending institutions of all sizes; and the need for explicit, paid-for government guarantees to cover catastrophic losses.

Recognizing that ensuring access and affordabilty in a new housing finance system is essential to a vibrant economy, the paper's authors also recommend the establishment of a Market Access Fund (MAF). Among the components included in the MAF: a Research and Development Fund to pilot testing of innovate products that expand the market for sustainable homeownership; a Credit Support Fund to increase access for sustainable homeownership and the rental market; and two funds that were created in 2008 to be funded by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Capital Magnet Fund, which would attract private capital investment in affordable housing and community development, and the National Housing Trust Fund, a block grant program to preserve the supply of rental housing for extremely low-income families.

The authors called for an end to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, recommending that the remaining assets to be sold to private investors to help repay taxpayers for backing these institutions. However, the authors do see a continued role for the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which primarily support first time homebuyers and affordable rental housing. That mission would be more explicitly defined in the author's proposal; under the new system, the FHA's share of the single family market would fall back to historical norms of 10-12% of mortgage originations. That is in contrast to today's share, which is at least 20%.

The paper does not address changes to the Federal Home Loan Bank System.

Search All Publications
Paper or pixels?
2 ways to subscribe to
the Milken Institute Review
Download the app for
iPhone, iPad and Kindle

Buy new digital editions of our quarterly economics journal for $1.99, purchase back issues for 99 cents or get a year's subscription for $5.99. Access links to related video and other content.
Order a 1-year subscription
Receive hard copies for $59, a small price to pay for our edgy, accessible and expert take on the latest in economics.
Subscribe Now
About Us
  Download Annual Report
  Our Team



  Global Conference
  Partnering for Cures
  State of the State
  Asia / California / London
  Young Leaders

  Latest News
  News Videos
  Press Releases

    Financial Markets
    Jobs and Human Capital
    Public Health


  Financial Innovations Labs
  Milken Institute Review
   Amazon Apps
   App Store
  Research Reports
  Search All Publications
Support MI
  Strategic Partners

Follow Us
  iTunes U

Related Sites
  Partnering For Cures
  Celebration of Science
  Chairman's Corner
  Melanoma Research Alliance

©2014 Milken Institute