About Research Events Centers Newsroom Currency of Ideas
 
Milken Institute | Research | Publications | Research Reports: Breaking (Banks) Up Is Hard To Do: New Perspective on "Too Big To Fail"
 Breaking (Banks) Up Is Hard To Do: New Perspective on
Breaking (Banks) Up Is Hard To Do: New Perspective on "Too Big To Fail"
March 6, 2013
Banking | Global Economy | Public Policy
Publisher: Milken Institute
Buy Printed Version $ 20.00

Big is bad. At least that has become the view of many individuals about big banks ever since the financial crisis of 2007-2009. The fear is that if a big bank gets into trouble, its problems will infect other financial institutions and threaten the entire economy, and this fear prompted bank bailouts, both in the U.S. and abroad. In the wake of that experience, regulators and banking experts almost unanimously agree that regulatory reform is essential to ensuring that no bank is ever again too big to fail.

Unfortunately, there is far less agreement about the best approach for ending too big to fail. As a result, a number of prominent bank regulators and industry experts recommend a more drastic change: simply breaking up the biggest banks.

There is no question that too big to fail is an urgent problem in need of a solution. But there are huge complexities at almost every level. What is “big?” How big is “too big”? What is a “bank?” What kinds of risk-taking are appropriate for a bank—and why? What do we know about the costs and benefits of different strategies?

This paper examines these issues in depth, including a look at measures of “bigness" for the world’s 100 biggest publicly traded banks. It also includes a discussion of two major and legitimate concerns about big banks. The first is that big banks, through a concentration of power, will successfully lobby regulators for leniency and effectively receive greater leeway for excessive risk taking. The second concern is that the failure of a big bank can radiate instability throughout the financial system, forcing policymakers to bail out troubled big banks for the sake of the overall economy.

The authors see little evidence that the regulatory reforms now being enacted will solve the problem of too big to fail. They believe breaking up banks would be a mistake at this time, pointing out that there's surprisingly little evidence that big banks per se caused the recent financial crises. Breaking up some or all of the world’s biggest financial institutions would unleash forces with unpredictable consequences and considerable risks. Instead, policymakers may simply have to monitor the incremental reforms they have already begun to implement and make adjustments as the results come in.

 
Search All Publications
2 ways to subscribe to
the Milken Institute Review
Download the app for
iPhone, iPad and Kindle

Buy new digital editions of our quarterly economics journal for $1.99, purchase back issues for 99 cents or get a year's subscription for $5.99. Access links to related video and other content.
Order a 1-year subscription
Receive hard copies for $59, a small price to pay for our edgy, accessible and expert take on the latest in economics.
About Us
  Careers
  Contact
  Download Annual Report
  FAQs
  Locations
  Our Team

Blog


Topics

Events
  Associates
  Conferences
  Global Conference
  State of the State
  Summits
  Atlanta / California / London
  Forums
  Labs
  Young Leaders

Experts
Newsroom
  Latest News
  News Videos
  Press Releases

Research
  Centers
    Asia
    California
    FasterCures
    Financial Markets
    Israel Center
    Public Health

Initiatives

Publications
  Books
  Financial Innovations Labs
  Milken Institute Review
   Amazon Apps
   App Store
  Research Reports
  Viewpoints
  Search All Publications
Support MI
  Associates
  Donate
  Sponsorships
  Strategic Partners

Follow Us
  @Twitter
  Facebook
  YouTube
  Google+
  LinkedIn
  iTunes U

Related Sites
  Partnering For Cures 2013
  Celebration of Science
  Chairman's Corner
  Melanoma Research Alliance
  FasterCures

©2014 Milken Institute