Support MI up for updates Subscribe up for updates
About Research Events Centers Newsroom Currency of Ideas
Milken Institute | Research | Publications | Research Reports: Capital Access Index 2006: Best Markets for Business Finance
 Capital Access Index 2006: Best Markets for Business Finance
Capital Access Index 2006: Best Markets for Business Finance
December 15, 2006
Business | Regional Economics

Buy Printed Version $ 10.00

The Capital Access Index ranks countries around the world in terms of the financial infrastructures that support entrepreneurial activity by providing access to capital. We look at such factors as macroeconomic environments, financial and banking institutions, the development of the equity and bond markets, and alternative capital sources. Because a firm's access to capital allows it to implement innovative ideas and contribute to technological advancement, job creation, and quality of life, the index is a tool for measuring how countries can act to reduce more fully their lending barriers.

Hong Kong moved to first place in this year's index, up from second place in 2005. Its general financial environment is among the world's best, with a sound banking system, a relatively large equity market and diversified sources of business funding, including venture capital. Singapore rank seconds, with a robust equity market and the availability of alternative sources of funds, such as credit cards, private capital funds and venture capital funds.

The United Kingdom drops from last year's first-place ranking to third place, due mainly to a decline in its macroeconomic environment score, which takes into consideration such variables as inflation rates, lending and tax rates, and a country's general financial sophistication. This drop does not necessarily indicate a deterioration in performance, but instead reflects the greater progress competitors have made in controlling inflation, relaxing lending rates and reducing interest rate volatility.

The number of countries covered by this year's index rose slightly, from 121 in the 2005 report, to 122. With the availability of more data, we were able to include Ecuador.

Among the top ten countries, seven saw improvement in their equity market rankings from the previous year. But all the countries also saw their rankings fall in terms of access to international capital. Australia improves its composite ranking, moving to sixth place and just behind the United States. Switzerland, at seventh, and the Netherlands, at eighth, are new additions to the top ten countries, and Ireland rounds out the list.

There are some significant changes in the 2006 top 20 rankings. In 2005, industrialized countries accounted for 16 of the top 20 rankings. In 2006, France and Spain dropped four and eight places, respectively. Emerging Asia countries ― Malaysia (13th), Thailand (19th) and South Korea (20th) ― now account for three of the top 20 rankings. (In 2005 Malaysia was the only emerging Asian country that ranked in the top 20.) Among countries ranked in the top half of the index, the largest improvements in both scores and rankings appear in the Middle East.

African countries remain at the lower part of the CAIrankings. Indeed, sixteen of the bottom 20 countries are African countries. Laos remains the only Asian country ranked in the bottom 20.

Each year the index also addresses an important development in global financial markets. This year's focus is on the hedge fund industry. We provide a comprehensive examination of some important aspects of the global hedge fund industry. We pay particular attention to changes in the performance and risk of funds over time, and to the impact of various strategies on these differences. We also examine the associations between characteristics of a fund (such as management fees and lockup periods) and its performance and risk, and the associations between characteristics and the likelihood that a fund will remain alive or enter the graveyard.

We found that:

  • the more volatile the return, the greater the likelihood of the fund not being alive.
  • the greater the average monthly returns over the period 1997 to 2005, the higher probability of a fund being alive.
  • the bigger the fund and the longer it has been in existence, the greater the probability that it will be alive.
  • management fees and performance incentives are positively associated with the likelihood of a fund being alive.
  • the longer the initial lockup period, the greater the likelihood of a fund being alive.
  • fund domiciled outside the United States and funds with assets invested outside the United States are associated with higher probability of being alive, even after controlling for different strategies that fund employed.
The Capital Access Index top 10 markets (with 2005 rankings):

1. Hong Kong (2)
2. Singapore (3)
3. United Kingdom (1)
4. Canada (10)
5. United States (4)
6. Australia (7)
7. Switzerland (12)
8. Netherlands (13)
9. Ireland (10)
10. Sweden (5)

View the rankings (pdf).

Search All Publications
Paper or pixels?
2 ways to subscribe to
the Milken Institute Review
Download the app for
iPhone, iPad and Kindle

Buy new digital editions of our quarterly economics journal for $1.99, purchase back issues for 99 cents or get a year's subscription for $5.99. Access links to related video and other content.
Order a 1-year subscription
Receive hard copies for $59, a small price to pay for our edgy, accessible and expert take on the latest in economics.
Subscribe Now
About Us
  Download Annual Report
  Our Team



  Global Conference
  Partnering for Cures
  State of the State
  Asia / California / London
  Young Leaders

  Latest News
  News Videos
  Press Releases

    Financial Markets
    Israel Center
    Public Health


  Financial Innovations Labs
  Milken Institute Review
   Amazon Apps
   App Store
  Research Reports
  Search All Publications
Support MI
  Strategic Partners

Follow Us
  iTunes U

Related Sites
  Partnering For Cures
  Celebration of Science
  Chairman's Corner
  Melanoma Research Alliance

©2014 Milken Institute